AMY&PINK

AND THEIR DANCING AND THEIR LAUGHING.

 
RSS Feed

Have we lost freedom?

The big fad of late are some brilliant minimalist posters, for television, old movies, hell, Rotten Tomatoes has a contest going on about it. So…why not? I made one for every Best Picture nominee. Spread ‘em, please.

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 5.5/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

This is a complicated, frustrating year. Most of the films in contention aren’t that great, the great performances and films are being largely ignored, and no prognosticator can agree on where the noms are going to line up in this field of 10. Hell, not even the voters can pick ten films to vote for! The nominations come out in less than 72 hours, so here are my kind of gutsy but most likely fail-filled predictions. Le sigh.

Best Picture
1. Avatar
2. The Hurt Locker
3. Inglourious Basterds
4. Up in the Air
5. Precious
6. The Blind Side
7. A Serious Man
8. Crazy Heart
9. An Education
10. Invictus

Best Director
1. Jim Cameron – Avatar
2. Kathryn Bigelow – The Hurt Locker
3. Jason Reitman – Up in the Air
4. Quentin Tarantino – Inglourious Basterds
5. Lee Daniels – Precious
Alternate: Clint Eastwood – Invictus

Best Actor
1. Colin Firth – A Single Man
2. Jeff Bridges – Crazy Heart
3. George Clooney – Up in the Air
4. Morgan Freeman – Invictus
5. Jeremy Renner – The Hurt Locker
Alternate: Sam Rockwell – Moon

Best Actress
1. Meryl Streep – Julie and Julia
2. Sandra Bullock – The Blind Side
3. Carey Mulligan – An Education
4. Gabourey Sidibe – Precious
5. Tilda Swinton – Julia
Alternate: Melanie Laurent – Inglourious Basterds

Best Supporting Actor
1. Christoph Waltz – Inglourious Basterds
2. Woody Harrelson – The Messenger
3. Christopher Plummer – The Last Station
4. Stanley Tucci – The Lovely Bones
5. Matt Damon – Invictus
Alternate: Peter Capaldi – In the Loop

Best Supporting Actress
1. Mo’Nique – Precious
2. Julianne Moore – A Single Man
3. Anna Kendrick – Up in the Air
4. Vera Farmiga – Up in the Air
5. Maggie Gyllenhaal – Crazy Heart
Alternate: Melanie Laurent – Inglourious Basterds

Best Adapted Screenplay
1. Up in the Air
2. District 9
3. An Education
4. Precious
5. Julie & Julia
Alternate: A Single Man

Best Original Screenplay
1. Inglourious Basterds
2. (500) Days of Summer
3. The Hurt Locker
4. Up
5. A Serious Man
Alternate: It’s Complicated

Best Animated Feature
1. Up
2. Princess and the Frog
3. Coraline
4. The Fantastic Mr. Fox
5. Ponyo
Alternate: Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs

Best Foreign Language Film
1. The White Ribbon
2. A Prophet
3. Samson & Delilah
4. The Secret in Their Eyes
5. The Milk of Sorrow
Alternate: Winter in Wartime

Best Documentary
1. The Cove
2. Food Inc.
3. Burma VJ
4. The Beaches of Agnes
5. Every Little Step
Alternate: Mugabe and the White African

Best Art Direction
1. Inglourious Basterds
2. Public Enemies
3. Sherlock Holmes
4. Avatar
5. A Serious Man
Alternate: Bright Star

Best Cinematography
1. Avatar
2. Inglourious Basterds
3. The White Ribbon
4. Nine
5. The Hurt Locker
Alternate: Where the Wild Things Are

Best Costumes
1. Nine
2. Sherlock Holmes
3. The Young Victoria
4. Inglourious Basterds
5. Sherlock Holmes
Alternate: Bruno

Best Editing
1. Avatar
2. The Hurt Locker
3. Inglourious Basterds
4. Up in the Air
5. District 9
Alternate: Precious

Best Makeup
1. The Imaginarium of Doctor Parnassus
2. Star Trek
3. District 9
Alternate: The Road

Best Sound Mixing
1. Avatar
2. The Hurt Locker
3. Star Trek
4. Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
5. Inglourious Basterds
Alternate: District 9

Best Sound Editing
1. Avatar
2. The Hurt Locker
3. Star Trek
4. Transformers: Revenge of the Fallen
5. District 9
Alternate: Inglourious Basterds

Best Score
1. Avatar
2. Sherlock Holmes
3. A Serious Man
4. Public Enemies
5. Up
Alternate: Coco Before Chanel

Best Song
1. The Weary King – Crazy Heart
2. Cinema Italiano – Nine
3. I See You – Avatar
4. You’ve Got Me Wrapped Around Your Little Finger – An Education
5. I Want To Come Home – Everybody’s Fine
Alternate: Stu’s Song – The Hangover

Best Visual Effects
1. Avatar
2. District 9
3. Star Trek
Alternate: Where the Wild Things Are

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 6.7/10 (3 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Hello distinguished members of the internet film press, blogosphere, etc.,

Matt Shapiro, the creator of “The Cinescape” that has gone around every year, has his new video out. After many people have copied the format and have raced to get them all out weeks before New Years, when he routinely puts them out (as Kees van Dijkhuizen’s video did for example).

I’m sending this to everyone because this year, Matt completely changed up the format. His videos have always been good, but like the rest of the people who make these videos, they were sentimental and nostalgic, maybe even too much so. This year, much to the disappointment of some on First Showing or AwardsDaily, who have already posted it, it is a very different breed of montage this year.

Set to Radiohead’s “Exit Music”, this one is a moody, somber, and overall artistic version of “the cinescape”, that doesn’t play as well to the “awwwwwwwww” factor. It’s different. It’s relevant. And most of all, it’s just plain damn good stuff.

Thanks for reading,
Zach Heltzel

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 6.7/10 (3 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)

“The world has spoken. Women want distant but controlling stalkers as boyfriends. We must respond accordingly.” says Splitter. I agree.

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 1.0/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: -1 (from 1 vote)

Before I begin writing any sort of review for The Twilight Saga: New Moon (Chris Weitz, 2009), I would have to give my history with the franchise. I was peer pressured to read the entire series just when it started to become popular, and as I finished the first novel, I was floored by how soul-crushingly awful it was. I think Stephenie Meyer and the way she glorifies her insanely warped views on relationships, sex and most of all just general human decency are disturbing, especially because of how her words and beliefs as defined by what she was written in these overlong messes of novels have become accepted by literally millions of females young and old. When I read New Moon, it seemed like it became even worse; the big bag of psychological disorders (Edward Cullen) who constantly wants to kill you and eat you, the abusive angry jerk (Jacob Black) who constantly wants to smash your face in, and the bothersomely vapid girl who everyone thinks is perfect and amazing (Bella Swan), loving the idea of either treating her like some sort of secondhand citizen and most of all, a rapedoll. You could read lots of essays and analyses about how the Twilight novels pretty much spells the end of feminism as we know it, so I’ll save you the time.

The first Twilight film earned a 2/100 from me. Catherine Hardwicke, who has directed some pretty effective work in the past, most notably Thirteen and Lords of Dogtown, had created a teen film that was so uneffective in every way that it was embarrassing to see that while it would make more money in a day than the rest of her films ever made, it might as well have been the end of her career. Every problem present in Meyer’s literary abortion was just amplified by the film being an absolute mess. The production values, from the special effects to the score (we know this isn’t your fault, Carter Burwell) to even the simple stuff like a sound effect were abysmal. Fans attributed this to the film being “low-budget”, but considering what the film required and the $37 million they had to spend, there were better production values when Danny Glover was in that very laughable car chase in James Wan’s first ‘Saw’ film. The film was an unwatchable mess that benefitted so much from the midnight showing that I attended, it was a step away from witnessing The Room, except instead of throwing spoons we had a bunch of overweight insecure teenage girls wetting their pants at the times that fans of the Tommy Wiseau film would have screamed “BECAUSE SHE’S A WOMAN!”

This transitions us into Chris Weitz’ New Moon, which starts out in this really awkward void. A large moon takes up the screen, and slowly fades away to reveal the title, which happens so slowly, it was evoking a bit of a 2001: A Space Odyssey vibe. Bella is running through a sea of red robed men and has a really vivid dream of Edward approaching her in a field where she turns into an old woman. This shot, and many more to come, are actually rather beautiful. But as far as I knew at this point of the film, it was still as awful as ever, and of course I was cracking up (only one to be doing so, naturally) every time Eddie sparkled all over his nearly naked body. It’s funny, it will always be funny, but it’s not like it is a hole that any filmmaker can dig out of at this point.

Then once the initial fifteen minutes of Bella whining to Edward and the Cullen’s of how she is growing up and wants to be a vampire so badly, the film does something that I never would have expected in a Twilight film. It takes every single complaint and joke made in a thread like the New Moon and Twilight threads in General Discussion at Rotten Tomatoes and makes it well aware that they know what is up. Edward is a 109 year old man who lurks high school for tail; this was on the mind of nearly everyone of my ilk, and now it’s been addressed. It was far more sugarcoated in the novel, and from that point on, the film manages to take it’s full stride.

Bold hyperbolic statement time: The film works very well for what it is and is still godawful if you view it the way Stephenie Meyer would want you to. But watching it for what it is, it is a lesser, more ambitious take on Hal Hartley’s Trust. A love story (or in this case, triangle) of some very screwed up people, and on top of that, these “perfect” characters are now nothing more than very immature, very angsty teenagers, and the film goes out of its way to show that. It’s safe to say that Chris Weitz has singlehandedly reinvented Twilight. That itself makes it clear that New Moon is nothing less than extraordinary. It takes an abymsal series and alchemises it into a cinematic silver medal. The film goes into business for itself, and when Weitz claims that this is supposed to be his signature piece after the studio-mangled bomb The Golden Compass, I believe him. He used this as an outlet for the film he wanted to make, and I feel confident in saying that Eclipse and Breaking Dawn won’t have this level of auteurism. And yes, I did call a Weitz brother an auteur. Shoot me.

When Edward finally breaks up with Bella because of Jasper’s little CAAAAAAAAAAAAAKE moment and the fact that she’s just a dumb loonie (but let’s face it, so is he), the film goes almost completely into self mockery, and through that self mockery it becomes a double edged sword. As the camera goes into 360 while Bella stares out the window, the months progressing, the sheer ridiculousness of her behavior is nothing short of hilarious, yet the cinematic effectiveness of it all makes even its most funny moments more emotionally effective and provocative than anything in the Twilight novels or the first film. It flat out criticizes all the behavior that is considered angelic by the fans of the series, yet does it in such a way to where fans can pull a completely different message from it. It is just as emotional as the most die hard fans think it is.

The tonal issues that Twilight had are fixed in a splendid way this time. All the times where Twilight was accidentally funny have been made to be hilarious to its own credit. The high school friends are now made into real people, while them and the rest of the high schoolers of the last film were nothing but grossly offensive carichatures. It gives talented actors like Anna Kendrick room to breathe and really put a nice edge to the film. The high school in the first film was one of the worst I’ve seen in a film; now it works better than it even needs to. That said, the Cullen family has been far reduced, and while they were by far the best thing about the first film, the entertaining and interesting nature of the film is reduced to one scene. It is mostly replaced with a greater focus on Jacob Black and his family, which I will get to later, but let’s get this out of the way, they’re awful. Edward is awful and all, but I would call myself “Team Cullen” only because “Team Black” is a bunch of annoying twits that deserve to be mauled by dogs…spoiler alert.

A long lull in the film that gives stuff a little time to breathe yet also pads the runtime too much for its own good comes from the development of Bella and Jacob as they bond and become this cutesy little almost-couple as Bella is constantly having nightmares and making hell for her father (Billy Burke), who in just about every scene has a big wide face that screams “My daughter is such a derpderp.” As Jacob becomes an outlet for Bella to get over Edward, Jacob gets drawn in by the always shirtless, airbrushed ab-showing fatties of his indian community. He cuts his hair, gets a tattoo, and suddenly threatens to beat the crap out of everyone, including our dear friend Mike, in one of the truly hilarious scenes of the film. Another bold statement, but only for me: Face Punch is the funniest movie within a movie since The Flower That Drank The Moon.

A big flaw of the book still present in the movie is that sideplot that brings our pseudo-villains from Twilight back into the action, Victoria and Laurent (sp?), who are boring, not theatrening at all, and serve as nothing more than a boring distraction. This dragging subplot serves as nothing more than a distraction to move some things along, and give us more opportunities for some absolutely awesome shots and scenes that have very little to do with the film itself, and show more of the stamp of the filmmakers doing what they wanted with the material. It’s too pretty, it’s too witty, and too insightful on its own vapid subjects where as I’ve stated and will continue to, I’m shocked how this film actually worked.

That said, the film has some serious third act problems. The whole Volturi subject, which are supposed to be the “villains” of the series, are both incredibly tacked on and are portrayed as some really nice, cool yet evil dudes. Michael Sheen and co. only really have one and a half scenes, but Sheen, who I’ve never seen not be great, seems to have so much fun with the role that with a some more screen time, he could absolutely steal future films from any director or actor. But, a line that comes towards the beginning of his performance, “Such a waste.” that he says in passing is pretty reflective of his role. It’s a tacked on annoyance that makes all this screentime left to those annoying werewolf boys fall flat. Edward’s stupid little suicide move leads us to the film’s one token action scene, which is anticlimactic but is about 200x better than one of the worst action scenes I’ve ever seen, from Twilight. An underplayed shot of a tour group being lead in by a hot vampiress in Italy to the room of vampires, who devour them all, is something that borught a huge smile to my face. This family of royalty is incredibly sinister and evil, and Weitz plays that well, but these are supposed to be the villains of the series, and I’m pretty sure that Stephenie Meyer does not want virgin viewers of the films wanting the Volturi to kill the shit out of Bella and Edward. Because I sure did.

And then…it ends. Jacob tries to blackmail Edward and treats Bella like she owns him, Bella finally takes a stand for once in her life and tells Jacob to GTFO, and then Edward asks Bella to marry her before he turns her into a vampy. It is made soul crushingly obvious that “being the one to turn her” is just a thinly veiled metaphor for losing your virginity, which in Meyer’s books, is treated like 1. something that someone like Bella desperately needs and 2. something that will cause you to suffer immeasurable pain the rest of your life. Spoiler alert for Breaking Dawn: holy shit is #2 true. I don’t need to spell it out, but this series is going to be really awesome when it gets to that point and if Lars Von Trier, David Cronenberg or Richard Kelly don’t get offered it, bring Weitz back. It is clear that he understands rapewolves and “when she’s 7, she’ll look 17″ and “he eats her because he’s hungry”, and that is why this film works. It eviscerates Twilight and while it probably will not be recognized by ANYONE as the game changer that it is, this may have saved the Twilight franchise from being a tremendously shitty fad a la Hannah Montana. I love the Harry Potter books, but New Moon is a better film than Half Blood Prince. Despite it being a tremendously flawed film, New Moon is probably the biggest surprise of the year. It took something I hate and floored me with it’s willingness to show just as much disdain for the characters as I have, some fantastic cinematography, and also a willingness to take itself seriously in a very mature way. The cliffhanger is almost as stupid as the one at the first Twilight, but instead of some flashy credit sequences with Radiohead’s 15 Step, it is Alexandre Desplat’s score set to some very shadowy yet classy text.

Hate the film as you might, and probably should because the source material is so awful (if you haven’t read it, don’t), you can’t deny that this is both a massive step up and far different from the first film. Actually, you could deny the former, but the latter, nah.

TEAM TYLER’S VAN!

7/10

EDIT: Postavant reader Armin helped me put it together; this film works because Weitz pretty much played every card from the Buffy playbook. Have to add that as in.

Also, read my Tweets that I made before and during the film at http://www.twitter.com/postavant

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 6.8/10 (6 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: +1 (from 3 votes)

More like Groan Ups…hah.

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 1.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Tonight has been a night of cancellations, with ABC axing Eastwick (which is better than the abysmal Cougar Town that comes on before it) and Hank, that Kelsey Grammar sitcom stinker. Good riddance to that one. But the one that matters is Fox getting rid of Dollhouse, which has been the lowest rated scripted show on the four major networks since it began. There are many reasons for that though, as in a traditional Joss Whedon/Fox collaboration, Fox refused to market it, stuck it on a Friday, and just let the thing die. Granted, we thought there was hope that Fox was confident in it despite having a horrid ratings report because of giving it a second season. But they’re cutting it short, not ordering episodes for the back 9, and all the atonement for past sins (Firefly) is suddenly undone among Whedonites. But it seems like everyone was prepared and made their statements in advance, so they knew that we would like what they say.

From all the Twitter posts (this site really is only good for celebrities and news outlets, as NOBODY FOLLOWS MINE HOLY SHIT)

@syfy: Looks like Fox finally canceled Dollhouse. (No, I don’t think we’ll pick it up.)

@stayingin: Least surprising news ever.

@RoushTVGuideMag: We’ll always have Epitaph One. (On DVD, not on Fox.)

@jennifergodwin: Contrarian POV: Fans should not attempt to save #Dollhouse but instead push Enver Gjokaj, Dichen Lachmann, etc for new, better jobs.

@IMDbTV Completely agree w/ @Memles: As much as I admired Dollhouse, I easily shift my interest to seeing what Whedon does next.

JossWhedon (via Whedonesque, not Twitter) By the time the last episode airs, you’ll know what my next project is.

But the best thing of all comes from star Eliza Dushku, who is blowing smoke most likely, but it’s awesome to hear anyway. She can go promise this on any other movie she pleases though, before it’s too late. Though it kind of is, it would have been nicer five years ago.

Eliza Dushku: “Should have been on Showtime so she could whip out them tits like Anna Paquin did for True Blood.”

This is what Fox is going to look like in the future, btw. Semi related.

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 5.5/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

You want to see a really awesome music video that borders on pornographic, full with boobs, boobs, penises, boobs, and even erect penises? Well, Wayne Coyne is delivering that. Click play if you dare.

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 1.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

The trailer and the poster are both solid for A Single Man, but I don’t feel they’re as good as I’m imagining this movie to be. They speak for themselves though, so I might as well not dwell on talking about them for a while, other than what has already been discussed repeatedly; The Weinsteins “hiding the gay”. The poster definitely does this, the trailer mostly does but that Matthew Goode kiss has to be as obvious as it can be. The quotes are awful, too. “Julianne Moore is already building Oscar buzz.” That’s not an endorsement, that’s a weightless observation!

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 5.0/10 (2 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Just when I start wishing to know about the new Rian Johnson movie, whatever it may be, now I get it. And while I knew that Duncan Jones (Moon) had Mute coming, I didn’t expect that something else would happen in the meantime. Rian Johnson (Brick, The Brothers Bloom)’s next film is…it’s a sci-fi film. Wasn’t expecting that, but the film, Looper, sounds awesome anyway just by nature. Duncan Jones’ project, Source Code, with Jake Gyllenhaal attached to star, sounds pretty cool too. Details on both after the jump.

Source Code, written by Ben Ripley and touched up by Billy Ray (Shattered Glass, Breach, both more-than-solid flicks), has been summarized by Brendon Connelly at /film, and it is made sure to be spoiler free and as he would admit, a sort of bastardized, not-as-interesting-sounding-as-it-actually is summation.

In the first scene, a man named Colter – Gyllenhaal’s character – wakes up on a train headed through the New Jersey countryside. He has no idea how he got there and nobody he speaks to can offer him any clues, though he is told that, to his surprise, he has taken this train every day for the last three months.

After some interaction with the various characters in his train car, many of whom become more important as the story unfolds (particularly Christina… but I won’t say why, and mention her in part to just raise the question of who the female lead might be), Colter heads to the bathroom where, quite surprisingly, he finds a bomb. Unfortunately, just after Colter finds it, a cell-phone detonator is triggered and…

…he’s killed. In fact, the entire train explodes. There’s a big ball of fire and, for just eight frames of film, some other cryptic goings on that only make sense later. We’re now seven or eight minutes in and about to be shocked.

…Colter awakens again, this time in an Isolation Unit where he’s being debriefed by a man named Goodwin, perhaps symbolically so. It seems that Captain Colter Stevens has just been living through a virtual simulation of the incident on the train in order to discover who it was that bombed it.

The cellphone maguffin is a smart one because everybody on the train will have one but finding the right one will also identify who the terrorist is. Simple, but sweet.

As the story goes on, there are only two types of scene – those that show Colter’s next journey into the same few simulated minutes on the train, and those that take place in the rather austere Isolation Unit in which he’s expected to report his findings and some unexpected twists come into play. Pretty soon there’s a suggestion that there’s more to the simulation than meets the eye and Colter may even be able, somehow, change history and prevent the train from exploding. It’s not unike a video game in which he’s stuck on the same level, dying over and over, repeated and repeated with a new approach to playing every time.

I was put in mind of Twelve Monkeys and the end of the story definitely has a few echoes of something from Brazil, but aside from the Gilliam resonances, there’s perhaps a mild whiff of Tony Scott’s Deja Vu too, as well as the House episode House’s Head, a certain bit of the UK version of Life on Mars and, I’ll say it so nobody else has to, Groundhog Day and Jack Sholder’s 12:01. The beginning certainly has a Final Destination vibe too, though the film heads off into completely distinct territory once the train has exploded.

I’ve just made a fairly original script seem like nothing but a horrendous patchwork. Ooops.

Summit Entertainment will release it in the United States.

Meanwhile, on rcjohnso.com and his Tumblr, this image popped up, much like the first info for Bloom popped up in early 2007. Rian has apparently been spending the last year writing Looper, which from the website for the film, littered with random images (again, like Bloom) is a science fiction film. Oh. My. GODDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDDD.

There were many more images on loopermovie.com today, EDIT: which links to the Tumblr

Follow both filmmakers on Twitter.

http://twitter.com/manMadeMoon

http://twitter.com/rcjohnso

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 1.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

This is…this is hilarious. And also going to be airing on Nickelodeon and Cartoon Network and all that jazz.

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 1.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Sam Smyth / Jeff Wells ftw

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Yeah, trailers. None of which are really memorable but have to be posted anywho. The trailers for Despicable Me seem…really odd, for an animated film, and in no way does that mean it looks good. Salt, the Angelina Jolie action summer fest looks like a big steaming pile, Chiwetel Eijofor aside. Everything after the jump.

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

There are a lot of things in Paranormal Activity, which has became the phenomenon I could have only imagined when I first posted about it, dying to see it on 12 screens, that just don’t add up. Coming out of the theater, as pumped/shaken/angry as you may be, a few of the plot elements just don’t mesh and don’t make a whole lot of sense, which while they aren’t necessarily “plotholes”, they don’t sit well. Why did they stay in the house? Why did they seem to become even more calm as things started to ramp up? Why does Micah keep abusing his girlfriend with his constant provoking of the demon inside the house and with his camera? ABUSING is the word that sticks out, and finally, all these little plot and character grievances go away. A theory that I saw go around Rotten Tomatoes and more specifically, Match Cut (), where I have seen more in-depth discussion on the matter, theorizing that the film is an allegory monster film, like The Host and Cloverfield, using the demonic lizard blah blah to highlight something entirely different but just as haunting.

A review / analysis of this theme by Match-Cut user balmakboor , which I will post here because it illustrates any point I could possibly make, and with an extra amount of eloquence too.

In Paranormal Activity [2007], a young woman, Katie, shares a home with her boyfriend Micah. After moving in together, she had shared with him that she’s been haunted since childhood. His response was to buy an expensive video camera and try to catch the ghosts in the act. She’s not crazy about the idea, but he’s so enthusiastic, like a boy with a new toy.

The early scenes have the slow, uneventful quality of home movies. The camera watches them sleep. A title on the screen says, “Night #1.” Nothing happens. I think a few people in the audience found the first ten minutes a bit trying. But, trust me on this, the movie is masterfully paced. It’s like placing a pot of water on a stove, calm at first, but, once the first bubbles appear, it is well on its way to a full boil.

One of the marvelous things about Paranormal Activity is that it scares you silly without showing you much. It’s like the great horror movies of the distant past such as Cat People [1942] and I Walked with a Zombie [1943]. Those drew their scares from shadows and silence. If you’re turned off by all the gore in recent horror movies, this may just be the ticket.

A friend complained about the movie. He said, “With all of the freaky things going on, why don’t the characters do something? Why don’t they go to a hotel?” “Well,” I replied, “the movie does say that the haunting goes wherever she goes, so not much point in leaving.” But later I wondered, “Maybe their inaction meant something more.”

When I was a kid, the next door neighbors were odd. They didn’t leave the house much. He was a pianist, she a housewife. One night, I awoke at 3:00 a.m. and heard a faint popping sound. I went back to sleep. In the morning, my mother was distraught and there were police cars everywhere. The housewife had shot the pianist dead during the night.

It came out that he had been abusing his wife for years, gradually building over time, until she was finally pushed over the edge. But why did they continue to live in this situation? Why didn’t she seek help or move out? They remained cut off from the world, until something really bad finally happened.

So, I’m asking you to consider this: Paranormal Activity is in one sense a nice, scary little demon-possession story about a guy who is a bit of an immature jerk sharing a haunted house with his girlfriend. And it is also an allegory representing something of a case studio in domestic violence.

I first noted a nice poetic symmetry between the title Paranormal Activity and the phrase “Domestic Violence.” Then I noticed a strange echo between the movie’s end titles and my childhood experience. Micah has been found dead by the police just as was the pianist. Katie has not been seen since just as was the case with the pianist’s wife – at least not by her neighbors. I then wondered what was going on, lurking just out of sight, between the beginning and the end.

As the abuser (abuse by over-zealous videoing?), Micah has no problem sleeping at night. As the abused, it is Katie who wakes up every night in fear. The abuser is in control, is the one with peace of mind. The victim is the one who suffers. Katie is always the one to awaken in the very early morning hours, sometimes screaming. Micah is such a sound sleeper that he even remains conked out after his blanket has been pulled from him.

Victims of abuse characteristically experience the feelings of there being no way out and no one to help them. The movie clearly makes the point that the demon will follow Katie wherever she goes. They could pack their bags and check into a motel, but it would be to no avail. There’s no escaping the terror. A psychic is invited into the home on two occasions. He is characterized as being ridiculously ineffective though. On his second visit, he can hardly wait to make tracks.

Abusive situations are often the latest in a long history of abuses. Both the man and the woman accept the behavior because they were taught to accept it by their parents. It is interesting how strongly the point is made that the haunting has been going on for Katie since childhood. And when her childhood photo is discovered, it has been burned around the edges. It has a similar visual effect as if she had rolled up her sleeve to reveal a cigarette burn on her arm, left there long ago by her father.

For the movie to be an allegory for an abusive relationship such as the one of my childhood experience, there are two things that must be represented: the abusive behavior of the man and the growing resistance to that abuse by the woman, her ultimately taking some final action to end it. The haunting, the demon, clearly represents the woman’s growing resistance. Along this line of thought, Katie’s final action of attacking the camera seems quite logical. It also makes sense that the demon’s entire animus is directed toward Micah – remember the photograph on the wall and Micah’s saying, “Why did it only scratch my face?”

The man’s abuse is represented by the camera and how Micah wields it. In movies of this first person video type, whenever a man (so often a man) points a camera at a woman (so often a woman) and keeps filming her even after she has asked him to stop, she is being violated, abused. Paranormal Activity contains constant variations on Katie asking Micah to stop and he only complies once, to get sex. Tensions build between them steadily. The use of profanity pointedly escalates throughout the film. She almost makes him leave the bedroom and sleep elsewhere with his camera at one point before they tentatively kiss and make up. And Katie’s going downstairs and outside at night can be read as escaping from the camera’s cruel gaze.

Paranormal Activity will go down in history as a movie that made countless people afraid to go to bed at night, like Psycho [1960] made people afraid to take showers. But the fear I’ll always remember is what must’ve been in the wife’s eyes as she looked into those of the pianist for the last time.

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 10.0/10 (1 vote cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)

Also known as my Oscar procrastination. Check out the fancy schmancy TOP 50 best picture chart in the new page. We need to find some voice here, and as the site goes through Overhaul #3, you can see which way we’re headed a bit. Every category will have its own chart soon.

VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0.0/10 (0 votes cast)
VN:F [1.8.3_1051]
Rating: 0 (from 0 votes)